മുള്ളർ ആവശ്യത്തിനുള്ള വെടിമരുന്ന് ഇട്ടിട്ടാണ് റിപ്പോർട്ട് സമർപ്പിച്ചത് . ഒന്ന് തീരുമ്പോൾ മറ്റൊന്നിന് തീ പിടിക്കത്തക്ക രീതിയിൽ പതിനാല് കേസ്സുകൾ വിവിധ സ്റ്റേറ്റേകളിലായി കത്തി കയറുന്നു . കൂടാതെ മാലപ്പടക്കംപോലെ കേറി വരുന്ന സുപ്പീനകൾ . അങ്ങനെ പണ്ട് അനേകരെ ലോ സൂട്ടിലൂടെ വലച്ച ട്രംപിന് ഇപ്പോൾ പത്തിരട്ടിയായി തിരിച്ചു കിട്ടുകായണ് . വാൾ എടുക്കുന്നവർ വാളാലെ . ഒരുത്തൻ ജീവിതം കള്ളത്തരത്തിലൂടെ പടുത്തുയർത്തിയാൽ അതിന്റെ ഫലങ്ങളും നേരായിരിക്കില്ല .  അമേരിക്കയെ ഗ്രെറ്റാക്കാം എന്ന് അയാൾ പറയുമ്പോൾ അതിന്റെ അർഥം അയാളെപ്പോലെ തട്ടിപ്പ് വെട്ടിപ്പ് കേസ് വഴക്ക് പീഡനം തുടങ്ങിയ മാർഗ്ഗങ്ങളാണ് .  അപ്പോൾ ഇവനെ പിന്തുടരുന്നവരുടെ സ്വഭാവം വായനക്കാർക്ക് അനുമാനിക്കാവുന്നതേയുള്ളു . കുന്തവും ബോബനും ജേക്കബും ഒക്കെ പോകുന്ന മാർഗ്ഗത്തിലൂടെ പോകണം എങ്കിൽ പൊക്കൊളു . കുടുംബം കുട്ടി ചോറാകും .  രണ്ടുമൂന്ന് വിവാഹം കഴിക്കാം സ്ത്രീകളെ പീഡിപ്പിക്കാം അങ്ങനെ പല ഗുണങ്ങളും ഉണ്ട് . 

ദുഷ്ടന്റെ വഴിയിൽ നടക്കാതെയും പാപികളുടെ ഇരിപ്പടത്തിൽ ഇരിക്കാത്തവരും ഭാഗ്യവാന്മാ

If Trump is not guilty of anything why he is stopping his officials from Testifying the congress?  

The drama is heating up on Capitol Hill after US Attorney General William Barr flaked out on a House hearing over the Mueller report.

Now the country's top law enforcement officer could be found in contempt of Congress.

Wait. What?

Here's what that means, and what could happen next:

What is contempt of Congress?

It means someone has obstructed the work of either Congress or a congressional committee.

House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler has threatened to hold Barr in contempt of Congress -- not because he skipped the hearing, but over a subpoena to obtain the unredacted version of special counsel Robert Mueller's report on Russian interference in the 2016 election.

While there are many ways someone can be in contempt of Congress, these days it usually happens when someone doesn't comply with a congressional subpoena, the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service said.

Sometimes that disobedience means refusing to appear before a committee to testify, and sometimes that means refusing to pony up requested documents.

What's the point of holding someone in contempt of Congress?

"Contempt may be used either to coerce compliance, to punish the contemnor, and/or to remove the obstruction," the Congressional Research Service said.

There are several ways members of Congress can do this:

1) They can tell the House or Senate sergeant at arms to detain or imprison the person in contempt until he or she honors congressional demands. This is called "inherent contempt." But it's super rare and hasn't happened in modern times.

2) Congress can certify a contempt citation to the executive branch -- headed by the President -- to try to get the person criminally prosecuted.

3) Congress can ask the judicial branch to enforce a congressional subpoena. In other words, Congress can seek a federal court's civil judgment saying the person is legally obligated to comply with the subpoena.

What are the challenges of holding someone in contempt of Congress?

If an official refuses to disclose information after the President says it's protected under executive privilege, "past practice suggests that the Department of Justice (DOJ) will not pursue a prosecution for criminal contempt," the Congressional Research Service said.

It can also be hard to get the executive branch to help. If the person in contempt is an executive branch official, efforts to punish him or her for not complying with a subpoena fail in many cases, the research center said.

So why don't members of Congress just use "inherent contempt" and tell their sergeant at arms to arrest the offender?

"Although the contemnor can be incarcerated until he agrees to comply with the subpoena, imprisonment may not extend beyond the end of the current session of Congress," the Congressional Research Service said.

"Moreover, inherent contempt has been described as 'unseemly,' cumbersome, time-consuming, and relatively ineffective, especially for a modern Congress with a heavy legislative workload that would be interrupted by a trial at the bar."

And that's why no one has gone down that route since 1935.

A new survey shows that 53% of Americans approve of President Donald Trump's handling of the economy, which is higher than the economic approval average of 45% that extended from Ronald Reagan through Barack Obama.

However, only 40% of Americans approve of the way Trump is handling foreign affairs and immigration.

In the Nov. 1-11 survey, Gallup asked, "Do you approve or disapprove of the way Donald Trump is handling ---?" the economy, foreign affairs, immigration, and healthcare policy.

On the economy, 53% approved, 44% disapproved.  Foreign affairs: 40% approved, 56% disapproved. Immigration: 40% approved, 57% disapproved. And healthcare policy: 36% approved and 58% disapproved.

"Trump's last two ratings on handling the economy -- 53% now and 50% in August -- are well above the average of 45% on this economic approval measure across presidents extending from Ronald Reagan through Barack Obama," said Gallup.  "By contrast, Trump's foreign affairs rating is well below the historical average of 50%."

Trump's 40% immigration approval rating "is right at the average for the six times Gallup has measured Trump's handling of the issue," said the polling firm. 

"Americans' relatively high approval ratings for Trump's handling of the economy reflect the public's overall positive sentiments on a number of economic indicators, including some readings that are as high as or higher than they have been in at least 18 years," said Gallup. 

If an election is done today, most of his Democratic opponents will win with double digit than Trump despite his economic success.  

He is  fraud and shouldn't be in power .  I don't know why some Malayalees cannot think .